In addition to requiring more space, modern ship defense systems are very expensive. Without more space to carry a lot more ammunition Navy surface ships in combat against adversaries such as China, that are armed with large numbers of UAVs and anti-ship missiles may “not be able to adequately defend themselves”. Limited depth of magazine refers to the fact that Navy surface ships can use surface-to-air missiles (SAMs) and Close-in Weapon System (CIWS) Gatling guns to shoot down only a certain number of enemy UAVs and anti-ship missiles before running out of SAMs and CIWS ammunition - a situation (which naval officers call “going Winchester”) that can require a ship to withdraw from battle, spend time travelling to a safe reloading location (which can be hundreds of miles away) to rendezvous with a Military Sealift Command ammunition ship. Traslated this means that fighting swarm drone attacks would require lots more ammunition which requires lots more money and space aboard ship. Early versions also were criticized as too lightly armed and armored to survive combat.By John Konrad (gCaptain) In a new study titled Navy Lasers, Railgun, and Gun-Launched Guided Projectiles the US Congress reports the two most important limitations that Navy surface ships currently face defending themselves against UAVs and anti-ship missiles are limited depth of magazine and unfavorable cost exchange ratios. But those mission modules were beset by problems, and the anti-submarine capability was canceled in the new budget.Īnd what about that speed? The fastest ship can’t outrun missiles, and firing up those marine turbines for an extra burst of speed turned the ships into gas guzzlers, analysts said. ![]() The ships were supposed to be made versatile through plug-and-play mission modules for surface combat, mine-sweeping operations or anti-submarine warfare. The ships topped 50 mph (80 kph) - fast enough to chase down pirates - and utilized steerable waterjets instead of conventional propellers. ![]() The Navy envisioned fast, highly maneuverable warships capable of operating in near-shore, littoral waters when it announced the program a few months after Sept. However, the littoral combat ships that are targeted are young. Those cuts surpass the proposed nine ships to be built. “We need a ready, capable, lethal force more than we need a bigger force that’s less ready, less lethal, and less capable,” he said Monday at the Navy League's Sea-Air-Space symposium in Maryland.Īll told, the Navy wants to scrap 24 ships, including five cruisers and a pair of Los Angeles-class submarines, as part of its cost-cutting needed to maintain the existing fleet and build modern warships. Mike Gilday, chief of naval operations, defended the proposal that emphasizes long-range weapons and modern warships, while shedding other ships ill equipped to face current threats. But it would also reduce the size of the fleet that’s already surpassed by China in sheer numbers, something that could cause members of Congress to balk.Īdm. The Navy contends in its budget proposal that the move would free up $50 million per ship annually for other priorities. ![]() Navy wants to decommission nine ships in the Freedom-class of littoral combat ships - warships that cost about $4.5 billion altogether to build. PORTLAND, Maine - The Navy that once wanted smaller, speedy warships to chase down pirates has made a speedy pivot to Russia and China - and many of those recently built ships could be retired.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |